feat(jira): sync the full Purple Team workflow status to Jira
Aegis CI / lint-and-test (push) Has been cancelled
Snyk Security Scan / Python vulnerabilities (backend) (push) Has been cancelled
Snyk Security Scan / npm vulnerabilities (frontend) (push) Has been cancelled
Snyk Security Scan / Docker image vulnerabilities (backend) (push) Has been cancelled

Previously only red_executing (-> "In Progress") ever changed the Jira
issue's status; every other Aegis transition (red_review, blue_evaluating,
blue_review, in_review, validated, rejected, disputed) only posted a
comment, leaving the Jira board stuck on whatever status it started with.

Expands push_test_event() to a full TestState -> Jira-status table
covering the whole lifecycle (To-Do -> In Progress -> RT Test Review ->
Queued Blue Team -> In Progress -> Blue Team Test Review -> Validation ->
Done/Rejected/Dispute), matching the Purple Team Jira workflow. Adds two
new lifecycle hooks that the generic dispatch can't handle correctly:

- push_bt_work_started(): blue_evaluating covers both "queued, unclaimed"
  and "actively being worked" — needs an explicit push when the blue tech
  clicks Start Evaluation, or it never leaves "Queued Blue Team".
- disputed state push: a conflicting lead vote previously produced zero
  Jira signal at all.

Also fills two real gaps: reopen_red_review and reopen_blue_review never
synced anything to Jira before. Their target status differs on purpose —
reopen_red_review pushes "In Progress" (Aegis resumes the same operator
immediately, no re-claim), while reopen_blue_review pushes "Queued Blue
Team" (Aegis clears blue_work_started_at, forcing a fresh "Start
Evaluation" click) — verified against the actual field-reset behavior in
test_entity.py rather than assumed symmetry between the two teams.
This commit is contained in:
kitos
2026-07-08 13:39:15 +02:00
parent ccc99439d5
commit 4ddd7f9ec3
4 changed files with 236 additions and 7 deletions
@@ -408,6 +408,12 @@ def reopen_red_review(db: Session, test: Test, user: User, notes: str) -> Test:
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Notification failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
try:
from app.services.jira_service import push_test_event
push_test_event(db, test, user, "red_executing", extra={"notes": notes.strip()})
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Jira push failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
return test
@@ -447,6 +453,12 @@ def start_blue_work(db: Session, test: Test, user: User) -> Test:
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Jira BT start date push failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
try:
from app.services.jira_service import push_bt_work_started
push_bt_work_started(db, test, user)
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Jira push failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
return test
@@ -601,6 +613,12 @@ def reopen_blue_review(db: Session, test: Test, user: User, notes: str) -> Test:
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Notification failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
try:
from app.services.jira_service import push_test_event
push_test_event(db, test, user, "blue_evaluating", extra={"notes": notes.strip()})
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Jira push failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
return test
@@ -1122,6 +1140,12 @@ def _dispatch_dual_validation_effects(
logger.warning("Jira push failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
elif event.name == "dual_validation_disputed":
if actor:
try:
from app.services.jira_service import push_test_event
push_test_event(db, test, actor, "disputed")
except Exception as e:
logger.warning("Jira push failed for test %s: %s", test.id, e, exc_info=True)
# Notify the lead who APPROVED asking them to review the rejection
_notify_validation_conflict(db, test, actor)
# Notify managers too, in case the dispute stalls and needs escalation